700R4 vs 4L60E

A brief Comparison: 700R4 vs 4L60E

In the realm of automotive transmissions, the debate between the 700R4 and 4L60E is a tale of subtle yet significant differences. Both transmissions may share a similar oil pan, but the distinction lies in the details: the 4L60E is identified by its 18-pin electronic connector located above the passenger side pan rail, contrasting with the 700R4’s cable connection near the cooler lines. This choice between electronics and no electronics echoes Mark Twain’s sentiment: “You pays your money, and you takes your choice.”

The decision often starts on the freeway, with the tiresome experience of spinning a small-block at 3,500 rpm, nudging one towards considering an upgrade to an overdrive automatic. Both the 700R4 and 4L60E offer the allure of overdrive, each with its own set of benefits and convenience. The ratios comparison between the TH350 and 700R4/4L60E is intriguing, especially with the 700R4/4L60E’s 3.06:1 First-gear ratio offering a theoretical advantage over the TH350’s 2.52:1. However, this comes with a notable rpm drop during the 1-2 and 2-3 gear changes, which is a minor issue at part throttle due to converter slippage.

The overdrive feature in both models, leading to a 30-percent reduction in cruise RPM, is a shared advantage, not exactly breaking news, but crucial for long drives. When it comes to price, the 700R4 often leads in the price war, being less expensive than its non-overdrive counterparts and not requiring a stand-alone controller for operation, unlike its digital compatriot. This could mean a saving of $600 to $1,200, a significant factor for many.

In essence, choosing between the 700R4 and 4L60E is not just a technical decision but also a financial and personal one, influenced by individual needs and preferences in automotive performance and convenience.

700R4: Installation and Challenges

Integrating the 700R4 transmission into your vehicle is a journey of precision and attention to detail. The process begins with the install, which involves hookup of the TV cable, shortening the driveshaft, moving the crossmember, and adding a 12-volt source to the transmission. This setup offers the luxury of choosing a lockup converter. There are kits available that lock the converter when the transmission shifts into overdrive, a feature enhanced by a special brake light switch. This switch is not only cheap and easy to wire into the transmission, but it also plays a crucial role by cutting power to the transmission when the brake pedal is pressed, thereby unlocking the converter.

A minor advantage of the 700R4 is its compatibility with old-school speedometer cables, making upgrading an older chassis relatively simple. It fits well into most early transmission tunnels, though some floor pan tweaking might be required. However, the journey with the 700R4 isn’t without its challenges. The gearbox’s biggest detriment, often blamed for 700R4s being disabled on the roadside, is the dreaded TV cable. This cable connects the throttle linkage to the throttle valve (TV) in the valve body. The Achilles heel of this system is the adjustment of the TV cable. Thousands of 700R4s have died due to incorrect adjustment, leading to low line pressure that smokes the clutches. It’s a situation that demands caution; as the saying goes, be forewarned, as failure can occur quickly.

700R4: Navigating the Installation Process

Integrating the 700R4 transmission into your vehicle indeed requires precision and attention to detail. The install process is multifaceted, starting with the hookup of the TV cable. This step is crucial for ensuring that the transmission communicates effectively with the engine. Next, you’ll find yourself shortening the driveshaft and moving the crossmember, tasks that demand both accuracy and patience. Adding a 12-volt source to the transmission is another critical step, powering up the system for optimal performance.

One of the perks of the 700R4 is the luxury of choosing a lockup converter. This choice is pivotal for those seeking enhanced control over their vehicle’s transmission behavior, especially when it shifts into overdrive. Fortunately, there are various kits available that facilitate this, enabling the converter to lock efficiently. An integral component of this system is a special brake light switch. This switch, known for being both cheap and easy to wire into the transmission, plays a vital role. It cuts power to the transmission when the brake pedal is engaged, an action that is essential for unlocking the converter when needed.

This detailed process of integrating the 700R4 highlights the blend of technical skill and careful planning required to ensure a smooth and successful installation. Each step, from the TV cable hookup to the brake light switch integration, contributes to the overall functionality and efficiency of the transmission in your vehicle.

Exploring the 700R4 and 4L60E Transmission Options

When delving into the world of transmissions, particularly the 700R4 and 4L60E, one encounters various aspects that are pivotal in the conversion process. Renowned companies like B&M and TCI offer specialized kits that are essential for this transition. However, it’s important to note that working with these kits often involves a trial-and-error effort. For instance, when adjusting the governor, a key component in the 700R4, the pressed-in governor cover must be removed to access it. This task alone can expect you to spend half a day or more, underscoring the intricate nature of this process.

When considering the main ones to focus on in a conversion to a 700R4, the biggest benefit that often comes to light is its affordability, especially when compared to its analog counterparts. This cost-effectiveness is a significant factor for many enthusiasts and professionals alike. On the other hand, looking into the details of the electronic 4L60E family of transmissions unveils a different scenario. These newer, digitally controlled versions offer some real rewards. Their advanced control systems and enhanced performance capabilities make them a compelling choice for those seeking the latest in transmission technology.

In summary, whether opting for the more affordable and straightforward 700R4 or the advanced, digitally controlled 4L60E, each transmission type presents its unique set of challenges and advantages, catering to different needs and preferences in the automotive world.

Understanding the 4L60E’s Technical Needs

When delving into the technical nuances of automotive transmissions, particularly the 700R4 and 4L60E, it’s essential to understand their unique requirements and adaptations. The 4L60E stands out with its specific demand for input from a throttle position sensor (TPS), a critical component for engines equipped with modern EFI systems. This sensor is integral to the transmission’s regime, ensuring seamless communication between the engine and transmission.

For those working with a carbureted engine, adapting a TPS becomes a necessary step. This is where HGM Automotive enters the picture, offering a slick TPS adapter that can bolt directly onto various carburetors like Holley, Edelbrock, and Q-jet. While other companies such as Holley and Innovate also provide TPS mounts, the HGM unit, known as Accu-Link, is particularly noteworthy for its ease of installation and reliability.

On the other hand, the 700R4 transmission, with its simpler mechanical setup, doesn’t require such complex adaptations. However, it does not match the 4L60E’s advanced control capabilities. The choice between these transmissions often boils down to balancing the expense and technical sophistication. Integrating a 4L60E into a classic car, for instance, adds an expense that must be integrated into the overall cost of the project.

In summary, while the 700R4 offers a more straightforward, cost-effective solution, especially for older vehicles, the 4L60E brings the advantage of full electronic control and adaptability to modern engines. This makes the 4L60E a compelling option for those looking to upgrade their vehicle with more advanced technology. The decision ultimately hinges on the specific needs of the vehicle and the preferences of the owner, balancing cost, complexity, and the desired level of control.

Integrating 4L60E in Early Muscle Cars

When it comes to integrating a 4L60E transmission into an early muscle car, the process often requires additional assistance. This is especially true when aligning the modern transmission with the factory speedometer. The 4L60E stands out as it generates an electronic vehicle speed output (VSS), which differs significantly from the traditional mechanical outputs found in classic cars.

There are various ways to ensure this modern system works effectively with older setups. The simplest method involves using an electronic speedometer that can convert the VSS transmission signal into a readable format. This approach offers a seamless transition from mechanical to digital systems, maintaining both accuracy and the classic feel of the vehicle. However, for those who prefer to keep the original look and feel of their muscle car, maintaining the car’s existing cable-driven speedometer is often desirable. In such instances, a product like Speedhut’s electric motor comes into play. This motor is designed to spin using either the transmission VSS signal or a GPS antenna, thereby driving the speedometer cable effectively.

From my experience, installing one of these boxes in a ’64 El Camino with a 4L60E transmission proved to be a successful endeavor. The system has performed admirably for over a year, demonstrating both the durability and reliability of this solution. However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that this approach does come with an added expense. Such costs must be considered carefully when deciding on the right transmission upgrade for your classic vehicle. Striking the right balance between modern functionality and maintaining the classic integrity of the muscle car is essential in these upgrades. It ensures that the vehicle’s soul is preserved while enhancing its performance and usability.

Technical Comparison

In the realm of transmissions, the 700R4 and 4L60E stand out, each marking its era in automotive history. Introduced in 1982, the 700R4 was known for its mechanical prowess with a TV cable on the passenger side and a distinct governor cover. This model evolved from a 27 spline to a 30 spline input shaft between 1982-1993, reflecting technological advancements. The 4L60E, appearing in 1993, marked a shift to computer-controlled transmissions, with a case connector on the passenger side and no governor cover, showcasing a new era in transmission design.

1. Design and Connector Differences

The 700R4, with its driver side case connector for lockup and TV cable hookup on the passenger side, contrasts sharply with the 4L60E’s servo cover and passenger side case connector. These design choices reflect the different approaches and technological shifts between the two models.

2. Internal Component Evolution

From 1982 to 1985, the 700R4 featured a 27 spline input shaft, which was updated to a 30 spline version from 1986 to 1993. The 4L60E transitioned from a 1 piece case during 1993-1996 to a more advanced 2 piece case with a removable bellhousing and a 6 bolt pattern on the rear from 1997 onwards, indicating a continual evolution in transmission technology.

3. Compatibility and Specificity in Models

Transmissions produced in 1993 and 1994 are interchangeable for any 4L60E 1 pc cases. However, 1995 transmissions are vehicle specific due to different OHMs readings, highlighting the need for precise matching when replacing or upgrading. Additionally, LS engines in 1999 saw the introduction of the 4L65E, discernible by a top bolt hole at the 12 o’clock position. From 2007 onward, the 4L70E, with its 15 pin connector as opposed to the older 13 pin, further exemplifies the advancements in transmission technology.

The 700R4 and 4L60E transmissions, while sharing similarities like the 4 bolt pattern on the rear, diverge in many respects. The 700R4’s mechanical speedometer gears and visual standpoint contrast with the 4L60E’s computer-controlled nature, VSS, and later models’ 15 pin connector. Personal experience and expertise in working with these units have underscored the importance of understanding these distinctions for effective vehicle maintenance and performance optimization.

In conclusion, the 700R4 and 4L60E transmissions, through their evolution and unique characteristics, provide a fascinating glimpse into the progression of automotive technology. Recognizing their differences is crucial for informed decisions regarding vehicle upkeep and enhancement.

Pros And Cons

TransmissionProsCons
700R41. Less expensive than 4L60E<br>2. Easier to install with minimal wiring<br>3. Popular upgrade support<br>4. Fits most early chassis<br>5. Transmission has cable speedometer output – no adapters needed1. Limited torque capacity with early transmissions<br>2. TV cable is difficult to adjust for proper pressure and up-shifts<br>3. Must use pressure gauge to set TV cable for proper part throttle up-shift<br>4. Often requires custom TV cable bracket and connection on carburetor or EFI<br>5. Custom WOT shift points require governor changes<br>6. Limited to converter lock-up only in overdrive (4th gear)<br>7. Needs special brake light switch to cut power to unlock converter when brake is applied<br>8. May require additional low-vacuum switch to cut out converter lockup under heavy part-throttle load – and then may cycle back and forth – requiring additional delay relay
4L60E1. Full and finite electronic control over all aspects of shift control, including WOT<br>2. Easy changes to part-throttle shift points and line pressure<br>3. Easy setup for desired converter lockup – can lock in third<br>4. Can tune shift points from the interior – no need to crawl under the car<br>5. Can buy EFI packages with transmission control as part of EFI – saves money<br>6. Increased torque capacity with 4L65-70-75 versions<br>7. LS engines can use the LS 4L60E – no adapters necessary<br>8. Speedometer calibration is simple1. Most expensive – must add separate controller – can cost up to $1,200<br>2. Needs a TPS input – must add with carburetor<br>3. Requires adapter to run either electric speedometer or motor to spin cable speedometer<br>4. Cooler lines use push-in clip connectors that often leak – should replace with a more traditional connector – AN or inverted flare
Table refers to technical comparison

A Detailed Comparison

1. Evolution in Design and Control

Initially introduced in 1982, the 700R4 featured a driver side case connector and a mechanical TV cable on the passenger side. In contrast, the 4L60E, emerging in 1993, embraced a computer-controlled approach with its case connector and servo cover located differently, signifying a shift in control mechanisms and overall transmission design.

2. Internal Mechanics and Compatibility

The 700R4 evolved from a 27 spline to a 30 spline input shaft between 1986-1993, reflecting advancements in mechanical design. The 4L60E, in 1997, introduced a 2 piece case with a removable bellhousing and 6 bolt pattern at the rear, indicating a focus on modularity and compatibility. This evolution was crucial for matching the transmissions to specific vehicle requirements.

3. Vehicle Specificity and Enhanced Models

By 1995, transmissions became more vehicle specific, with different OHMs readings in 4L60E 1 pc cases, pointing to a tailored approach in automotive solutions. The introduction of LS engines in 1999, and the subsequent arrival of 4L65E and 4L70E models with top bolt hole at the 12 o’clock position and 15 pin connectors, underscored the ongoing innovation in these systems.

4. Structural and Functional Differences

The 700R4, known for its governor cover and speedometer gears, contrasted with the 4L60E’s later models, which lacked the governor cover but included a 13 pin connector, indicating a divergence in structure and function. Additionally, the 4 bolt pattern on the rear remained a common feature, maintaining a certain level of continuity between the models.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the journey from the 700R4 to the 4L60E and its successors reflects the dynamic evolution of automotive technology. From their visual distinctions to the standpoint of control and adaptability, these units showcase the industry’s commitment to innovation and response to diverse automotive needs. Drawing from personal experience, the 4L60E—with its family members like the 4L65E and 4L70E—has been a reliable companion in my automotive endeavors. Its capability to handle higher-torque scenarios without a hiccup speaks volumes of its design—a far cry from the problematic days of the 700-R4.

Leave a Comment